Make (Integromat) vs Zoho Flow
Comprehensive comparison for 2026 — features, pricing, and expert verdict
Overview
The debate between Make (Integromat) and Zoho Flow comes up frequently in online communities and industry forums. Both tools bring unique strengths to the table, and the best choice depends heavily on your specific needs, budget, and technical requirements. We have put together this detailed analysis to help you cut through the marketing noise and focus on what each platform actually delivers.
Ratings Comparison
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Make (Integromat) | Zoho Flow |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Builder | Yes | Yes |
| Code Support | Yes | Yes |
| Api Connections | Yes | Yes |
| Scheduling | Yes | Yes |
| Conditional Logic | Yes | Yes |
| Error Handling | Yes | Yes |
| Team Collaboration | Yes | Yes |
| Templates | Yes | Yes |
| Webhook Support | Yes | Yes |
| Ai Actions | Yes | No |
| Free Plan | Yes | Yes |
| Starting Price | Free | Free |
| Founded | 2012 | 1996 |
Feature Analysis
Both Make (Integromat) and Zoho Flow share a solid foundation of core features including Visual Builder, Code Support, Api Connections, Scheduling. Where Make (Integromat) pulls ahead is with exclusive access to Ai Actions, which can be a deciding factor for teams that rely on this capability. Looking at user ratings, Make (Integromat) holds an overall score of 9/10 and an ease of use score of 7/10, while Zoho Flow scores 6/10 overall and 6/10 for ease of use. These ratings reflect real user experiences and can indicate differences in usability, support quality, and overall satisfaction.
Pricing Breakdown
When it comes to pricing, both Make (Integromat) and Zoho Flow offer flexible pricing models. Both platforms offer free plans, which is great for testing before committing. Make (Integromat)'s free tier and Zoho Flow's free tier each have their own limitations, so it is worth evaluating both to see which free offering better matches your initial needs.
Pros & Cons
Make (Integromat)
- Superior visual workflow builder
- Much better value than Zapier for high volume
- Advanced data manipulation and routing
Cons
- -Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- -Fewer native integrations
- -Can be overwhelming for beginners
Zoho Flow
- Excellent value within Zoho ecosystem
- Generous free plan
- Custom functions with Deluge scripting
Cons
- -Best only if using other Zoho products
- -Fewer third-party integrations
- -UI feels dated
Who Should Choose Which?
The ideal user for each platform differs considerably. Make (Integromat) is best suited for power users, agencies, complex automations, making it a strong choice if you fall into any of these categories. Zoho Flow, meanwhile, shines for Zoho users, small businesses, budget conscious teams, which means it may be the better pick if your needs align with those use cases. Founded in 2012, Make (Integromat) describes itself as "Visual platform for designing, building, and automating complex workflows." Zoho Flow, established in 1996, positions itself as "Integration platform connecting Zoho and third-party apps with automated workflows." With 16 years between them, Zoho Flow brings the maturity and proven track record of a veteran platform, while Make (Integromat) offers the fresh perspective and modern architecture of a newer entrant.
Our Verdict
After analyzing all the data, **Make (Integromat)** comes out slightly ahead in this comparison, thanks to higher user ratings (9.0 vs 6.0), more features (10 vs 9), availability of a free plan. However, this does not mean Zoho Flow is a poor choice — far from it. Zoho Flow excels in its own right, particularly for Zoho users and small businesses. Our recommendation: if you value superior visual workflow builder, go with Make (Integromat). If excellent value within zoho ecosystem matters more to you, Zoho Flow is the way to go. Either way, both are solid platforms that have earned their place in the market.