Make (Integromat) vs Workato
Comprehensive comparison for 2026 — features, pricing, and expert verdict
Overview
The debate between Make (Integromat) and Workato comes up frequently in online communities and industry forums. Both tools bring unique strengths to the table, and the best choice depends heavily on your specific needs, budget, and technical requirements. We have put together this detailed analysis to help you cut through the marketing noise and focus on what each platform actually delivers.
Ratings Comparison
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Make (Integromat) | Workato |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Builder | Yes | Yes |
| Code Support | Yes | Yes |
| Api Connections | Yes | Yes |
| Scheduling | Yes | Yes |
| Conditional Logic | Yes | Yes |
| Error Handling | Yes | Yes |
| Team Collaboration | Yes | Yes |
| Templates | Yes | Yes |
| Webhook Support | Yes | Yes |
| Ai Actions | Yes | Yes |
| Free Plan | Yes | No |
| Starting Price | Free | Custom |
| Founded | 2012 | 2013 |
Feature Analysis
Both Make (Integromat) and Workato share a solid foundation of core features including Visual Builder, Code Support, Api Connections, Scheduling. Interestingly, both platforms offer nearly identical feature sets. The difference lies more in the implementation quality and depth of each feature rather than feature availability itself. Looking at user ratings, Make (Integromat) holds an overall score of 9/10 and an ease of use score of 7/10, while Workato scores 8/10 overall and 5/10 for ease of use. These ratings reflect real user experiences and can indicate differences in usability, support quality, and overall satisfaction.
Pricing Breakdown
When it comes to pricing, both Make (Integromat) and Workato offer flexible pricing models. Make (Integromat) has a notable advantage here with its free plan, allowing you to get started without any financial commitment. Workato does not currently offer a free tier, which means you will need to pay from day one.
Pros & Cons
Make (Integromat)
- Superior visual workflow builder
- Much better value than Zapier for high volume
- Advanced data manipulation and routing
Cons
- -Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- -Fewer native integrations
- -Can be overwhelming for beginners
Workato
- Top-tier enterprise security and compliance
- Powerful recipe-based automation model
- Strong community recipes library
Cons
- -Enterprise pricing is prohibitive for SMBs
- -Complex setup for simple tasks
- -Requires training to use effectively
Who Should Choose Which?
The ideal user for each platform differs considerably. Make (Integromat) is best suited for power users, agencies, complex automations, making it a strong choice if you fall into any of these categories. Workato, meanwhile, shines for enterprises, IT departments, large scale integrations, which means it may be the better pick if your needs align with those use cases. Founded in 2012, Make (Integromat) describes itself as "Visual platform for designing, building, and automating complex workflows." Workato, established in 2013, positions itself as "Enterprise integration and automation platform with AI-powered recipes." Both platforms have been in the market for a similar duration, giving each ample time to refine their offerings and build a loyal user base.
Our Verdict
After analyzing all the data, **Make (Integromat)** comes out slightly ahead in this comparison, thanks to higher user ratings (9.0 vs 8.0), availability of a free plan. However, this does not mean Workato is a poor choice — far from it. Workato excels in its own right, particularly for enterprises and IT departments. Our recommendation: if you value superior visual workflow builder, go with Make (Integromat). If top-tier enterprise security and compliance matters more to you, Workato is the way to go. Either way, both are solid platforms that have earned their place in the market.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Learn More
Make (Integromat) details | Workato details | All ai automation tools