Make (Integromat) vs UiPath
Comprehensive comparison for 2026 — features, pricing, and expert verdict
Overview
Make (Integromat) and UiPath are two of the most talked-about solutions in the software space. Whether you are a small business owner, a growing startup, or an established enterprise, picking the right tool can significantly impact your workflow and results. Let us break down how these two platforms compare across the metrics that matter most.
Ratings Comparison
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Make (Integromat) | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Builder | Yes | Yes |
| Code Support | Yes | Yes |
| Api Connections | Yes | Yes |
| Scheduling | Yes | Yes |
| Conditional Logic | Yes | Yes |
| Error Handling | Yes | Yes |
| Team Collaboration | Yes | Yes |
| Templates | Yes | Yes |
| Webhook Support | Yes | Yes |
| Ai Actions | Yes | Yes |
| Free Plan | Yes | Yes |
| Starting Price | Free | Free |
| Founded | 2012 | 2005 |
Feature Analysis
Both Make (Integromat) and UiPath share a solid foundation of core features including Visual Builder, Code Support, Api Connections, Scheduling. Interestingly, both platforms offer nearly identical feature sets. The difference lies more in the implementation quality and depth of each feature rather than feature availability itself. Looking at user ratings, Make (Integromat) holds an overall score of 9/10 and an ease of use score of 7/10, while UiPath scores 9/10 overall and 6/10 for ease of use. These ratings reflect real user experiences and can indicate differences in usability, support quality, and overall satisfaction.
Pricing Breakdown
When it comes to pricing, both Make (Integromat) and UiPath offer flexible pricing models. Both platforms offer free plans, which is great for testing before committing. Make (Integromat)'s free tier and UiPath's free tier each have their own limitations, so it is worth evaluating both to see which free offering better matches your initial needs.
Pros & Cons
Make (Integromat)
- Superior visual workflow builder
- Much better value than Zapier for high volume
- Advanced data manipulation and routing
Cons
- -Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- -Fewer native integrations
- -Can be overwhelming for beginners
UiPath
- Industry-leading RPA platform
- Excellent Studio designer for developers
- Strong community and marketplace
Cons
- -Enterprise pricing is very high
- -Complex licensing model
- -Steep learning curve for advanced features
Who Should Choose Which?
The ideal user for each platform differs considerably. Make (Integromat) is best suited for power users, agencies, complex automations, making it a strong choice if you fall into any of these categories. UiPath, meanwhile, shines for enterprises, process automation, IT departments, which means it may be the better pick if your needs align with those use cases. Founded in 2012, Make (Integromat) describes itself as "Visual platform for designing, building, and automating complex workflows." UiPath, established in 2005, positions itself as "Leading enterprise RPA platform for end-to-end intelligent automation." With 7 years between them, UiPath brings the maturity and proven track record of a veteran platform, while Make (Integromat) offers the fresh perspective and modern architecture of a newer entrant.
Our Verdict
After analyzing all the data, **Make (Integromat)** comes out slightly ahead in this comparison, thanks to availability of a free plan. However, this does not mean UiPath is a poor choice — far from it. UiPath excels in its own right, particularly for enterprises and process automation. Our recommendation: if you value superior visual workflow builder, go with Make (Integromat). If industry-leading rpa platform matters more to you, UiPath is the way to go. Either way, both are solid platforms that have earned their place in the market.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Learn More
Make (Integromat) details | UiPath details | All ai automation tools