Make (Integromat) vs Power Automate
Comprehensive comparison for 2026 — features, pricing, and expert verdict
Overview
The debate between Make (Integromat) and Power Automate comes up frequently in online communities and industry forums. Both tools bring unique strengths to the table, and the best choice depends heavily on your specific needs, budget, and technical requirements. We have put together this detailed analysis to help you cut through the marketing noise and focus on what each platform actually delivers.
Ratings Comparison
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Make (Integromat) | Power Automate |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Builder | Yes | Yes |
| Code Support | Yes | Yes |
| Api Connections | Yes | Yes |
| Scheduling | Yes | Yes |
| Conditional Logic | Yes | Yes |
| Error Handling | Yes | Yes |
| Team Collaboration | Yes | Yes |
| Templates | Yes | Yes |
| Webhook Support | Yes | Yes |
| Ai Actions | Yes | Yes |
| Free Plan | Yes | No |
| Starting Price | Free | $15/mo |
| Founded | 2012 | 2016 |
Feature Analysis
Both Make (Integromat) and Power Automate share a solid foundation of core features including Visual Builder, Code Support, Api Connections, Scheduling. Interestingly, both platforms offer nearly identical feature sets. The difference lies more in the implementation quality and depth of each feature rather than feature availability itself. Looking at user ratings, Make (Integromat) holds an overall score of 9/10 and an ease of use score of 7/10, while Power Automate scores 7/10 overall and 6/10 for ease of use. These ratings reflect real user experiences and can indicate differences in usability, support quality, and overall satisfaction.
Pricing Breakdown
When it comes to pricing, Make (Integromat) offers a more budget-friendly entry point at Free, compared to Power Automate's starting price of $15/mo. Make (Integromat) has a notable advantage here with its free plan, allowing you to get started without any financial commitment. Power Automate does not currently offer a free tier, which means you will need to pay from day one.
Pros & Cons
Make (Integromat)
- Superior visual workflow builder
- Much better value than Zapier for high volume
- Advanced data manipulation and routing
Cons
- -Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- -Fewer native integrations
- -Can be overwhelming for beginners
Power Automate
- Deep Microsoft ecosystem integration
- Desktop and cloud automation combined
- Included in many Microsoft 365 plans
Cons
- -Best value only within Microsoft stack
- -UI can feel clunky and slow
- -Confusing licensing tiers
Who Should Choose Which?
The ideal user for each platform differs considerably. Make (Integromat) is best suited for power users, agencies, complex automations, making it a strong choice if you fall into any of these categories. Power Automate, meanwhile, shines for Microsoft 365 users, enterprises, Office heavy workflows, which means it may be the better pick if your needs align with those use cases. Founded in 2012, Make (Integromat) describes itself as "Visual platform for designing, building, and automating complex workflows." Power Automate, established in 2016, positions itself as "Microsoft's cloud-based automation service for business workflows." Both platforms have been in the market for a similar duration, giving each ample time to refine their offerings and build a loyal user base.
Our Verdict
After analyzing all the data, **Make (Integromat)** comes out slightly ahead in this comparison, thanks to higher user ratings (9.0 vs 7.0), availability of a free plan. However, this does not mean Power Automate is a poor choice — far from it. Power Automate excels in its own right, particularly for Microsoft 365 users and enterprises. Our recommendation: if you value superior visual workflow builder, go with Make (Integromat). If deep microsoft ecosystem integration matters more to you, Power Automate is the way to go. Either way, both are solid platforms that have earned their place in the market.