Make (Integromat) vs Pipefy
Comprehensive comparison for 2026 — features, pricing, and expert verdict
Overview
Choosing between Make (Integromat) and Pipefy is a common dilemma for professionals looking for the right solution. Both platforms have carved out significant market positions, but they take notably different approaches to solving similar problems. In this comprehensive comparison, we analyze every aspect that matters — from features and pricing to user experience and support — so you can make an informed decision.
Ratings Comparison
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Make (Integromat) | Pipefy |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Builder | Yes | Yes |
| Code Support | Yes | No |
| Api Connections | Yes | Yes |
| Scheduling | Yes | Yes |
| Conditional Logic | Yes | Yes |
| Error Handling | Yes | Yes |
| Team Collaboration | Yes | Yes |
| Templates | Yes | Yes |
| Webhook Support | Yes | Yes |
| Ai Actions | Yes | Yes |
| Free Plan | Yes | Yes |
| Starting Price | Free | Free |
| Founded | 2012 | 2014 |
Feature Analysis
Both Make (Integromat) and Pipefy share a solid foundation of core features including Visual Builder, Api Connections, Scheduling, Conditional Logic. Where Make (Integromat) pulls ahead is with exclusive access to Code Support, which can be a deciding factor for teams that rely on this capability. Looking at user ratings, Make (Integromat) holds an overall score of 9/10 and an ease of use score of 7/10, while Pipefy scores 7/10 overall and 7/10 for ease of use. These ratings reflect real user experiences and can indicate differences in usability, support quality, and overall satisfaction.
Pricing Breakdown
When it comes to pricing, both Make (Integromat) and Pipefy offer flexible pricing models. Both platforms offer free plans, which is great for testing before committing. Make (Integromat)'s free tier and Pipefy's free tier each have their own limitations, so it is worth evaluating both to see which free offering better matches your initial needs.
Pros & Cons
Make (Integromat)
- Superior visual workflow builder
- Much better value than Zapier for high volume
- Advanced data manipulation and routing
Cons
- -Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- -Fewer native integrations
- -Can be overwhelming for beginners
Pipefy
- Excellent pipe/kanban workflow model
- Good free tier for small teams
- Strong templates for common processes
Cons
- -Can feel rigid for complex workflows
- -Limited customization on lower plans
- -Reporting needs improvement
Who Should Choose Which?
The ideal user for each platform differs considerably. Make (Integromat) is best suited for power users, agencies, complex automations, making it a strong choice if you fall into any of these categories. Pipefy, meanwhile, shines for HR teams, procurement, service management, which means it may be the better pick if your needs align with those use cases. Founded in 2012, Make (Integromat) describes itself as "Visual platform for designing, building, and automating complex workflows." Pipefy, established in 2014, positions itself as "AI-enhanced business process automation with customizable workflows." Both platforms have been in the market for a similar duration, giving each ample time to refine their offerings and build a loyal user base.
Our Verdict
After analyzing all the data, **Make (Integromat)** comes out slightly ahead in this comparison, thanks to higher user ratings (9.0 vs 7.0), more features (10 vs 9), availability of a free plan. However, this does not mean Pipefy is a poor choice — far from it. Pipefy excels in its own right, particularly for HR teams and procurement. Our recommendation: if you value superior visual workflow builder, go with Make (Integromat). If excellent pipe/kanban workflow model matters more to you, Pipefy is the way to go. Either way, both are solid platforms that have earned their place in the market.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Learn More
Make (Integromat) details | Pipefy details | All ai automation tools