Make (Integromat) vs n8n
Comprehensive comparison for 2026 — features, pricing, and expert verdict
Overview
Make (Integromat) and n8n are two of the most talked-about solutions in the software space. Whether you are a small business owner, a growing startup, or an established enterprise, picking the right tool can significantly impact your workflow and results. Let us break down how these two platforms compare across the metrics that matter most.
Ratings Comparison
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Make (Integromat) | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Builder | Yes | Yes |
| Code Support | Yes | Yes |
| Api Connections | Yes | Yes |
| Scheduling | Yes | Yes |
| Conditional Logic | Yes | Yes |
| Error Handling | Yes | Yes |
| Team Collaboration | Yes | Yes |
| Templates | Yes | Yes |
| Webhook Support | Yes | Yes |
| Ai Actions | Yes | Yes |
| Free Plan | Yes | Yes |
| Starting Price | Free | Free |
| Founded | 2012 | 2019 |
Feature Analysis
Both Make (Integromat) and n8n share a solid foundation of core features including Visual Builder, Code Support, Api Connections, Scheduling. Interestingly, both platforms offer nearly identical feature sets. The difference lies more in the implementation quality and depth of each feature rather than feature availability itself. Looking at user ratings, Make (Integromat) holds an overall score of 9/10 and an ease of use score of 7/10, while n8n scores 8/10 overall and 6/10 for ease of use. These ratings reflect real user experiences and can indicate differences in usability, support quality, and overall satisfaction.
Pricing Breakdown
When it comes to pricing, both Make (Integromat) and n8n offer flexible pricing models. Both platforms offer free plans, which is great for testing before committing. Make (Integromat)'s free tier and n8n's free tier each have their own limitations, so it is worth evaluating both to see which free offering better matches your initial needs.
Pros & Cons
Make (Integromat)
- Superior visual workflow builder
- Much better value than Zapier for high volume
- Advanced data manipulation and routing
Cons
- -Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- -Fewer native integrations
- -Can be overwhelming for beginners
n8n
- Self-hostable and fair-code licensed
- No per-task pricing limits
- Excellent for developers with code nodes
Cons
- -Requires technical skills to self-host
- -Smaller integration library than Zapier
- -Community support can be inconsistent
Who Should Choose Which?
The ideal user for each platform differs considerably. Make (Integromat) is best suited for power users, agencies, complex automations, making it a strong choice if you fall into any of these categories. n8n, meanwhile, shines for developers, self hosters, privacy conscious teams, which means it may be the better pick if your needs align with those use cases. Founded in 2012, Make (Integromat) describes itself as "Visual platform for designing, building, and automating complex workflows." n8n, established in 2019, positions itself as "Fair-code workflow automation platform with self-hosting option." With 7 years between them, Make (Integromat) brings the maturity and proven track record of a veteran platform, while n8n offers the fresh perspective and modern architecture of a newer entrant.
Our Verdict
After analyzing all the data, **Make (Integromat)** comes out slightly ahead in this comparison, thanks to higher user ratings (9.0 vs 8.0), availability of a free plan. However, this does not mean n8n is a poor choice — far from it. n8n excels in its own right, particularly for developers and self hosters. Our recommendation: if you value superior visual workflow builder, go with Make (Integromat). If self-hostable and fair-code licensed matters more to you, n8n is the way to go. Either way, both are solid platforms that have earned their place in the market.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Learn More
Make (Integromat) details | n8n details | All ai automation tools