Kissflow vs Make (Integromat)
Comprehensive comparison for 2026 — features, pricing, and expert verdict
Overview
Choosing between Kissflow and Make (Integromat) is a common dilemma for professionals looking for the right solution. Both platforms have carved out significant market positions, but they take notably different approaches to solving similar problems. In this comprehensive comparison, we analyze every aspect that matters — from features and pricing to user experience and support — so you can make an informed decision.
Ratings Comparison
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Kissflow | Make (Integromat) |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Builder | Yes | Yes |
| Code Support | Yes | Yes |
| Api Connections | Yes | Yes |
| Scheduling | Yes | Yes |
| Conditional Logic | Yes | Yes |
| Error Handling | Yes | Yes |
| Team Collaboration | Yes | Yes |
| Templates | Yes | Yes |
| Webhook Support | Yes | Yes |
| Ai Actions | No | Yes |
| Free Plan | No | Yes |
| Starting Price | $1500/mo | Free |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
Feature Analysis
Both Kissflow and Make (Integromat) share a solid foundation of core features including Visual Builder, Code Support, Api Connections, Scheduling. On the other hand, Make (Integromat) uniquely offers Ai Actions, giving it an edge for users who prioritize this area. Looking at user ratings, Kissflow holds an overall score of 6/10 and an ease of use score of 7/10, while Make (Integromat) scores 9/10 overall and 7/10 for ease of use. These ratings reflect real user experiences and can indicate differences in usability, support quality, and overall satisfaction.
Pricing Breakdown
When it comes to pricing, Make (Integromat) comes in at a lower starting price of Free, while Kissflow begins at $1500/mo. Make (Integromat) stands out by offering a free plan, giving you a risk-free way to explore the platform. Kissflow requires a paid subscription from the start.
Pros & Cons
Kissflow
- Combines workflow and project management
- Easy form and process builder
- Good for business process digitization
Cons
- -Expensive for small teams
- -Limited integration options
- -Not ideal for complex technical automations
Make (Integromat)
- Superior visual workflow builder
- Much better value than Zapier for high volume
- Advanced data manipulation and routing
Cons
- -Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- -Fewer native integrations
- -Can be overwhelming for beginners
Who Should Choose Which?
The ideal user for each platform differs considerably. Kissflow is best suited for mid market companies, process owners, HR teams, making it a strong choice if you fall into any of these categories. Make (Integromat), meanwhile, shines for power users, agencies, complex automations, which means it may be the better pick if your needs align with those use cases. Founded in 2012, Kissflow describes itself as "Low-code work platform for process automation and project management." Make (Integromat), established in 2012, positions itself as "Visual platform for designing, building, and automating complex workflows." Both platforms have been in the market for a similar duration, giving each ample time to refine their offerings and build a loyal user base.
Our Verdict
After analyzing all the data, **Make (Integromat)** comes out slightly ahead in this comparison, thanks to higher user ratings (9.0 vs 6.0), more features (10 vs 9), availability of a free plan. However, this does not mean Kissflow is a poor choice — far from it. Kissflow excels in its own right, particularly for mid market companies and process owners. Our recommendation: if you value superior visual workflow builder, go with Make (Integromat). If combines workflow and project management matters more to you, Kissflow is the way to go. Either way, both are solid platforms that have earned their place in the market.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Learn More
Kissflow details | Make (Integromat) details | All ai automation tools