Fellow vs Todoist
Comprehensive comparison for 2026 — features, pricing, and expert verdict
Overview
Choosing between Fellow and Todoist is a common dilemma for professionals looking for the right solution. Both platforms have carved out significant market positions, but they take notably different approaches to solving similar problems. In this comprehensive comparison, we analyze every aspect that matters — from features and pricing to user experience and support — so you can make an informed decision.
Ratings Comparison
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Fellow | Todoist |
|---|---|---|
| Task Management | Yes | Yes |
| Ai Assistant | Yes | Yes |
| Calendar | Yes | Yes |
| Notes | Yes | No |
| Collaboration | Yes | Yes |
| Automation | Yes | No |
| Integrations | Yes | Yes |
| Templates | Yes | Yes |
| Analytics | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile App | Yes | Yes |
| Free Plan | Yes | Yes |
| Starting Price | Free | Free |
| Founded | 2017 | 2007 |
Feature Analysis
Both Fellow and Todoist share a solid foundation of core features including Task Management, Ai Assistant, Calendar, Collaboration. Where Fellow pulls ahead is with exclusive access to Notes and Automation, which can be a deciding factor for teams that rely on these capabilities. Looking at user ratings, Fellow holds an overall score of 7/10 and an ease of use score of 8/10, while Todoist scores 8/10 overall and 9/10 for ease of use. These ratings reflect real user experiences and can indicate differences in usability, support quality, and overall satisfaction.
Pricing Breakdown
When it comes to pricing, both Fellow and Todoist offer flexible pricing models. Both platforms offer free plans, which is great for testing before committing. Fellow's free tier and Todoist's free tier each have their own limitations, so it is worth evaluating both to see which free offering better matches your initial needs.
Pros & Cons
Fellow
- Excellent meeting note templates
- AI summarizes meetings automatically
- Great for 1-on-1 management
Cons
- -Focused mainly on meetings
- -Requires team adoption to be useful
- -AI transcription requires paid plan
Todoist
- Best natural language task input
- Clean and distraction-free design
- Excellent cross-platform sync
Cons
- -Limited project management features
- -AI features are basic
- -No built-in time tracking
Who Should Choose Which?
The ideal user for each platform differs considerably. Fellow is best suited for managers, meeting heavy teams, leadership, making it a strong choice if you fall into any of these categories. Todoist, meanwhile, shines for individuals, freelancers, GTD practitioners, which means it may be the better pick if your needs align with those use cases. Founded in 2017, Fellow describes itself as "AI meeting management platform for agendas, notes, and action items." Todoist, established in 2007, positions itself as "Simple and powerful task manager with natural language input and smart scheduling." With 10 years between them, Todoist brings the maturity and proven track record of a veteran platform, while Fellow offers the fresh perspective and modern architecture of a newer entrant.
Our Verdict
After analyzing all the data, **Todoist** comes out slightly ahead in this comparison, thanks to higher user ratings (8.0 vs 7.0), availability of a free plan. However, this does not mean Fellow is a poor choice — far from it. Fellow excels in its own right, particularly for managers and meeting heavy teams. Our recommendation: if you value best natural language task input, go with Todoist. If excellent meeting note templates matters more to you, Fellow is the way to go. Either way, both are solid platforms that have earned their place in the market.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Learn More
Fellow details | Todoist details | All ai productivity tools