Cleanvoice vs Krisp
Comprehensive comparison for 2026 — features, pricing, and expert verdict
Overview
The debate between Cleanvoice and Krisp comes up frequently in online communities and industry forums. Both tools bring unique strengths to the table, and the best choice depends heavily on your specific needs, budget, and technical requirements. We have put together this detailed analysis to help you cut through the marketing noise and focus on what each platform actually delivers.
Ratings Comparison
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Cleanvoice | Krisp |
|---|---|---|
| Text To Speech | No | No |
| Voice Cloning | No | No |
| Speech To Text | No | Yes |
| Noise Removal | Yes | Yes |
| Music Generation | No | No |
| Podcast Editing | Yes | No |
| Multilingual | Yes | No |
| Api Access | Yes | No |
| Custom Voices | No | No |
| Real Time | No | Yes |
| Free Plan | Yes | Yes |
| Starting Price | $10/mo | $8/mo |
| Founded | 2021 | 2017 |
Feature Analysis
Both Cleanvoice and Krisp share a solid foundation of core features including Noise Removal. Where Cleanvoice pulls ahead is with exclusive access to Podcast Editing and Multilingual and Api Access, which can be a deciding factor for teams that rely on these capabilities. On the other hand, Krisp uniquely offers Speech To Text and Real Time, giving it an edge for users who prioritize these areas. Looking at user ratings, Cleanvoice holds an overall score of 7/10 and an ease of use score of 9/10, while Krisp scores 8/10 overall and 9/10 for ease of use. These ratings reflect real user experiences and can indicate differences in usability, support quality, and overall satisfaction.
Pricing Breakdown
When it comes to pricing, Krisp comes in at a lower starting price of $8/mo, while Cleanvoice begins at $10/mo. Both platforms offer free plans, which is great for testing before committing. Cleanvoice's free tier and Krisp's free tier each have their own limitations, so it is worth evaluating both to see which free offering better matches your initial needs.
Pros & Cons
Cleanvoice
- Excellent filler word removal
- Handles multiple languages
- Simple upload-and-clean workflow
- API available
Cons
- -Very niche tool
- -No recording or TTS
- -Processing can be slow
Krisp
- Best-in-class noise cancellation
- Works with any app
- Meeting transcription
- Low latency
Cons
- -Narrow use case
- -Free tier limited to 60min/day
- -No audio editing
Who Should Choose Which?
The ideal user for each platform differs considerably. Cleanvoice is best suited for podcast post production, cleaning up recorded audio, making it a strong choice if you fall into any of these categories. Krisp, meanwhile, shines for remote workers on calls, noisy environment meetings, which means it may be the better pick if your needs align with those use cases. Founded in 2021, Cleanvoice describes itself as "AI removes filler words, mouth sounds, and dead air." Krisp, established in 2017, positions itself as "AI noise cancellation for calls and meetings." Both platforms have been in the market for a similar duration, giving each ample time to refine their offerings and build a loyal user base.
Our Verdict
After analyzing all the data, **Krisp** comes out slightly ahead in this comparison, thanks to higher user ratings (8.0 vs 7.0), more competitive pricing, availability of a free plan. However, this does not mean Cleanvoice is a poor choice — far from it. Cleanvoice excels in its own right, particularly for podcast post production and cleaning up recorded audio. Our recommendation: if you value best-in-class noise cancellation, go with Krisp. If excellent filler word removal matters more to you, Cleanvoice is the way to go. Either way, both are solid platforms that have earned their place in the market.