Activepieces vs Make (Integromat)
Comprehensive comparison for 2026 — features, pricing, and expert verdict
Overview
Activepieces and Make (Integromat) are two of the most talked-about solutions in the software space. Whether you are a small business owner, a growing startup, or an established enterprise, picking the right tool can significantly impact your workflow and results. Let us break down how these two platforms compare across the metrics that matter most.
Ratings Comparison
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Activepieces | Make (Integromat) |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Builder | Yes | Yes |
| Code Support | Yes | Yes |
| Api Connections | Yes | Yes |
| Scheduling | Yes | Yes |
| Conditional Logic | Yes | Yes |
| Error Handling | Yes | Yes |
| Team Collaboration | Yes | Yes |
| Templates | Yes | Yes |
| Webhook Support | Yes | Yes |
| Ai Actions | No | Yes |
| Free Plan | Yes | Yes |
| Starting Price | Free | Free |
| Founded | 2022 | 2012 |
Feature Analysis
Both Activepieces and Make (Integromat) share a solid foundation of core features including Visual Builder, Code Support, Api Connections, Scheduling. On the other hand, Make (Integromat) uniquely offers Ai Actions, giving it an edge for users who prioritize this area. Looking at user ratings, Activepieces holds an overall score of 7/10 and an ease of use score of 8/10, while Make (Integromat) scores 9/10 overall and 7/10 for ease of use. These ratings reflect real user experiences and can indicate differences in usability, support quality, and overall satisfaction.
Pricing Breakdown
When it comes to pricing, both Activepieces and Make (Integromat) offer flexible pricing models. Both platforms offer free plans, which is great for testing before committing. Activepieces's free tier and Make (Integromat)'s free tier each have their own limitations, so it is worth evaluating both to see which free offering better matches your initial needs.
Pros & Cons
Activepieces
- Fully open-source and self-hostable
- Clean modern UI
- Growing rapidly with active community
Cons
- -Fewer integrations than established players
- -Relatively new and evolving
- -Limited enterprise features
Make (Integromat)
- Superior visual workflow builder
- Much better value than Zapier for high volume
- Advanced data manipulation and routing
Cons
- -Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- -Fewer native integrations
- -Can be overwhelming for beginners
Who Should Choose Which?
The ideal user for each platform differs considerably. Activepieces is best suited for startups, developers, budget conscious teams, making it a strong choice if you fall into any of these categories. Make (Integromat), meanwhile, shines for power users, agencies, complex automations, which means it may be the better pick if your needs align with those use cases. Founded in 2022, Activepieces describes itself as "Open-source no-code automation platform alternative to Zapier." Make (Integromat), established in 2012, positions itself as "Visual platform for designing, building, and automating complex workflows." With 10 years between them, Make (Integromat) brings the maturity and proven track record of a veteran platform, while Activepieces offers the fresh perspective and modern architecture of a newer entrant.
Our Verdict
After analyzing all the data, **Make (Integromat)** comes out slightly ahead in this comparison, thanks to higher user ratings (9.0 vs 7.0), more features (10 vs 9), availability of a free plan. However, this does not mean Activepieces is a poor choice — far from it. Activepieces excels in its own right, particularly for startups and developers. Our recommendation: if you value superior visual workflow builder, go with Make (Integromat). If fully open-source and self-hostable matters more to you, Activepieces is the way to go. Either way, both are solid platforms that have earned their place in the market.